<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1485 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case concerning disallowed CENVAT credit for services from G4S Facility Services amounting to Rs. 6,60,381. The appellant argued the services were in the nature of Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service, supported by the agreement detailing services like front office and housekeeping. The respondent contended the services were not manpower recruitment services, citing canteen facilities and gym maintenance. The Tribunal found the nature of services had not been previously discussed and remanded the matter for verification, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:49:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1485 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case concerning disallowed CENVAT credit for services from G4S Facility Services amounting to Rs. 6,60,381. The appellant argued the services were in the nature of Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service, supported by the agreement detailing services like front office and housekeeping. The respondent contended the services were not manpower recruitment services, citing canteen facilities and gym maintenance. The Tribunal found the nature of services had not been previously discussed and remanded the matter for verification, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>