<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1483 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377462</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the applicability of turnover tax under Section 6B(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. The Court upheld that &#039;total turnover&#039; includes all turnovers, rejecting the argument to tax only &#039;taxable turnover.&#039; It affirmed the State&#039;s legislative competence to levy tax on total turnover, distinguishing it from interstate transactions. The Court emphasized strict interpretation of taxing statutes, reaffirming the purpose of Section 6B(1) for dealer identification and tax rate prescription. The appeals were dismissed with no costs, and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1483 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377462</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the applicability of turnover tax under Section 6B(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. The Court upheld that &#039;total turnover&#039; includes all turnovers, rejecting the argument to tax only &#039;taxable turnover.&#039; It affirmed the State&#039;s legislative competence to levy tax on total turnover, distinguishing it from interstate transactions. The Court emphasized strict interpretation of taxing statutes, reaffirming the purpose of Section 6B(1) for dealer identification and tax rate prescription. The appeals were dismissed with no costs, and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>