<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1482 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377461</link>
    <description>Tablet computers were disputed under the Gujarat VAT rate entry for information technology products, with reliance placed on the corresponding Central Excise Tariff classification and a CBEC circular treating them as heading 8471 30. The assessment order was also challenged for not giving reasons for rejecting that classification. On that basis, notice was issued and interim protection was granted by restraining coercive action under the assessment order pending hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:24:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1482 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377461</link>
      <description>Tablet computers were disputed under the Gujarat VAT rate entry for information technology products, with reliance placed on the corresponding Central Excise Tariff classification and a CBEC circular treating them as heading 8471 30. The assessment order was also challenged for not giving reasons for rejecting that classification. On that basis, notice was issued and interim protection was granted by restraining coercive action under the assessment order pending hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>