<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1480 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377459</link>
    <description>The Madras HC held that sale of scrap generated as a by-product in the manufacturing process could qualify for sales tax deferral under the industrial incentive scheme where the term &quot;product&quot; was construed purposively. A manufactured by-product that is a distinct commercial commodity is not excluded merely because it is not the principal output. The Court noted that the earlier order in the appellant&#039;s own matter had already required reconsideration on the basis that steel scrap formed part of &quot;product&quot; for the eligibility certificate. The restrictive view limiting the benefit to principal manufactured goods was unsustainable, and the denial of deferral was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1480 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377459</link>
      <description>The Madras HC held that sale of scrap generated as a by-product in the manufacturing process could qualify for sales tax deferral under the industrial incentive scheme where the term &quot;product&quot; was construed purposively. A manufactured by-product that is a distinct commercial commodity is not excluded merely because it is not the principal output. The Court noted that the earlier order in the appellant&#039;s own matter had already required reconsideration on the basis that steel scrap formed part of &quot;product&quot; for the eligibility certificate. The restrictive view limiting the benefit to principal manufactured goods was unsustainable, and the denial of deferral was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>