<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1479 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377458</link>
    <description>Carbon dioxide supplied to a sister concern was treated as a sale for Tamil Nadu sales tax purposes, but turnover had to be confined to the actual consideration attributable to the supply and could not automatically follow the full excise invoice value. Excise valuation and sales tax valuation operate on different bases, so the amount collected towards the central excise duty component could be brought to tax, while the balance shown in the invoices could not. Best judgment enhancement was also rejected because the assessing authority had not recorded satisfaction of suppression or produced material showing understatement; suspicion, party relationship, or product value could not replace proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1479 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377458</link>
      <description>Carbon dioxide supplied to a sister concern was treated as a sale for Tamil Nadu sales tax purposes, but turnover had to be confined to the actual consideration attributable to the supply and could not automatically follow the full excise invoice value. Excise valuation and sales tax valuation operate on different bases, so the amount collected towards the central excise duty component could be brought to tax, while the balance shown in the invoices could not. Best judgment enhancement was also rejected because the assessing authority had not recorded satisfaction of suppression or produced material showing understatement; suspicion, party relationship, or product value could not replace proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>