<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (7) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279653</link>
    <description>The Court declared the award made by the Bengal Chamber of Commerce Tribunal consisting of Mr. Jamieson and Mr. Luke as invalid due to the defective constitution of the Court. The Registrar&#039;s failure to appoint a new arbitrator in place of Mr. Jamieson rendered the award void. The judgment nullified the award solely on the ground of the Court&#039;s defective constitution, without prejudice to other contentions raised. The respondent was directed to pay the costs of the application, emphasizing the importance of adhering to rules governing arbitrator appointment and substitution for the validity of arbitration awards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 17:26:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (7) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279653</link>
      <description>The Court declared the award made by the Bengal Chamber of Commerce Tribunal consisting of Mr. Jamieson and Mr. Luke as invalid due to the defective constitution of the Court. The Registrar&#039;s failure to appoint a new arbitrator in place of Mr. Jamieson rendered the award void. The judgment nullified the award solely on the ground of the Court&#039;s defective constitution, without prejudice to other contentions raised. The respondent was directed to pay the costs of the application, emphasizing the importance of adhering to rules governing arbitrator appointment and substitution for the validity of arbitration awards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>