<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 67 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17470</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision that payments made for liquidated damages due to non-operation of leased mines were capital expenditures, not eligible for deduction. The court emphasized that the expenditure was related to acquiring assets, not operational activities, as the assessee was in the business of screening and selling iron ore, not mining. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the deduction claim and affirming the capital nature of the expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 67 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17470</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision that payments made for liquidated damages due to non-operation of leased mines were capital expenditures, not eligible for deduction. The court emphasized that the expenditure was related to acquiring assets, not operational activities, as the assessee was in the business of screening and selling iron ore, not mining. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the deduction claim and affirming the capital nature of the expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>