<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 996 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279652</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the lower court&#039;s judgment and quashed the order summoning the appellants. The Court found no criminal liability under Section 341 IPC as the accused did not physically obstruct the complainant. Additionally, it ruled that vicarious liability does not apply to the Managing Director and Directors without explicit statutory provision. The Court criticized the lower court for summoning the accused without sufficient evidence of direct involvement, emphasizing the need for careful examination of evidence before issuing summons in criminal cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 996 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279652</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the lower court&#039;s judgment and quashed the order summoning the appellants. The Court found no criminal liability under Section 341 IPC as the accused did not physically obstruct the complainant. Additionally, it ruled that vicarious liability does not apply to the Managing Director and Directors without explicit statutory provision. The Court criticized the lower court for summoning the accused without sufficient evidence of direct involvement, emphasizing the need for careful examination of evidence before issuing summons in criminal cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>