<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 665 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279649</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the respondent was not entitled to seniority benefits under the 1973 or 1980 Rules as he was commissioned after the relevant period and joined the State service in 1988. The Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, ruling that the 1980 Rules did not provide reservation and the respondent did not qualify under the 1973 Rules. The appeals were allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:08:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 665 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279649</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the respondent was not entitled to seniority benefits under the 1973 or 1980 Rules as he was commissioned after the relevant period and joined the State service in 1988. The Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, ruling that the 1980 Rules did not provide reservation and the respondent did not qualify under the 1973 Rules. The appeals were allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>