https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279646 A challenge to an arbitral award cannot be expanded with a fresh ground after expiry of the Section 34 limitation period under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; only points already raised in the original petition may be clarified, so the chamber summons was rightly rejected. An agreement describing a business centre arrangement with furniture, office space and ancillary services was not shown on the record to be a leave and licence transaction attracting rent-control protections or exclusive jurisdiction, so the public policy attack failed. The tribunal's award of interest was also sustained because Section 31(7) permits reasonable interest where parties have not agreed otherwise, and no illegality was shown. en-us Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:06:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279646 A challenge to an arbitral award cannot be expanded with a fresh ground after expiry of the Section 34 limitation period under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; only points already raised in the original petition may be clarified, so the chamber summons was rightly rejected. An agreement describing a business centre arrangement with furniture, office space and ancillary services was not shown on the record to be a leave and licence transaction attracting rent-control protections or exclusive jurisdiction, so the public policy attack failed. The tribunal's award of interest was also sustained because Section 31(7) permits reasonable interest where parties have not agreed otherwise, and no illegality was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279646