https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279645 An objection to an arbitral award filed after the limitation period could not be treated as a valid application to set aside the award, because the Arbitration Act, 1940 operated as a self-contained code and challenges under section 30 had to be made within the period prescribed by Article 158 of the Limitation Act, 1908. A time-barred objection could not be converted into an application under section 33, and the court could not bypass limitation by invoking any implied power to set aside the award on section 30 grounds. The award therefore remained effective, and the decree in terms of the award stood. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:03:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279645 An objection to an arbitral award filed after the limitation period could not be treated as a valid application to set aside the award, because the Arbitration Act, 1940 operated as a self-contained code and challenges under section 30 had to be made within the period prescribed by Article 158 of the Limitation Act, 1908. A time-barred objection could not be converted into an application under section 33, and the court could not bypass limitation by invoking any implied power to set aside the award on section 30 grounds. The award therefore remained effective, and the decree in terms of the award stood. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279645