https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279645 The Supreme Court held that objections falling under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, must be raised within the 30-day limitation period to challenge an award effectively. The Court emphasized the necessity of making a timely application under Section 33 of the Act to set aside an award based on grounds specified in Section 30. The Court rejected the appellant's argument that the court could suo motu set aside the award beyond the limitation period, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for challenging arbitration awards. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the significance of procedural requirements under the Arbitration Act and the Limitation Act in setting aside arbitration awards. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:03:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279645 The Supreme Court held that objections falling under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, must be raised within the 30-day limitation period to challenge an award effectively. The Court emphasized the necessity of making a timely application under Section 33 of the Act to set aside an award based on grounds specified in Section 30. The Court rejected the appellant's argument that the court could suo motu set aside the award beyond the limitation period, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for challenging arbitration awards. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the significance of procedural requirements under the Arbitration Act and the Limitation Act in setting aside arbitration awards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279645