https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279643 An acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was upheld where objections under Section 5-A were heard by a duly authorised Collector and the Government considered the report and allied materials; later comments and supplementary inquiry did not by themselves show a breach. Section 5-A and Section 40 were treated as serving different statutory functions, so a further inquiry under Section 40 could validly supplement the earlier objection process. The Section 41 agreement was construed as a whole and held to sufficiently state public-user terms; the proposed Students' Home was treated as a work directly useful to a section of the public, supporting acquisition under Section 40(1)(b). en-us Mon, 10 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:17:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279643 An acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was upheld where objections under Section 5-A were heard by a duly authorised Collector and the Government considered the report and allied materials; later comments and supplementary inquiry did not by themselves show a breach. Section 5-A and Section 40 were treated as serving different statutory functions, so a further inquiry under Section 40 could validly supplement the earlier objection process. The Section 41 agreement was construed as a whole and held to sufficiently state public-user terms; the proposed Students' Home was treated as a work directly useful to a section of the public, supporting acquisition under Section 40(1)(b). Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279643