https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279642 The court found that the sarkat notes of 1953 and 1956 were acknowledgments under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, not the Stamp Act, allowing the suit to proceed within the limitation period. However, the suit was deemed legally defective for not including the plaintiff's sisters, who were necessary parties under the Hindu Succession Act. Despite acknowledging the validity of the plaintiff's claim, the court dismissed the appeal due to the improper framing of the suit, emphasizing the importance of including all relevant parties in legal proceedings. en-us Sat, 30 Jun 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:09:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279642 The court found that the sarkat notes of 1953 and 1956 were acknowledgments under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, not the Stamp Act, allowing the suit to proceed within the limitation period. However, the suit was deemed legally defective for not including the plaintiff's sisters, who were necessary parties under the Hindu Succession Act. Despite acknowledging the validity of the plaintiff's claim, the court dismissed the appeal due to the improper framing of the suit, emphasizing the importance of including all relevant parties in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 30 Jun 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279642