<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1464 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377443</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision confirming the penalty imposed by the AO under section 271B of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that since the assessee did not maintain any books of accounts, there was no requirement for audit, and therefore, the penalty was not justified. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision and canceled the penalty, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1464 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377443</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision confirming the penalty imposed by the AO under section 271B of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that since the assessee did not maintain any books of accounts, there was no requirement for audit, and therefore, the penalty was not justified. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision and canceled the penalty, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>