<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 21 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17459</link>
    <description>A reassessment based on alleged non-disclosure could not be sustained where the assessment records showed that balance-sheets and relevant particulars had already been furnished and the original valuation had been accepted on that basis. The alternative statutory ground, based on information allegedly already in the officer&#039;s possession, was not pleaded, investigated, or made the basis of the reassessment before the lower authorities. In reference jurisdiction, a new factual or legal foundation requiring record support cannot be introduced for the first time. On that footing, the Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the reassessment was upheld and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 21 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17459</link>
      <description>A reassessment based on alleged non-disclosure could not be sustained where the assessment records showed that balance-sheets and relevant particulars had already been furnished and the original valuation had been accepted on that basis. The alternative statutory ground, based on information allegedly already in the officer&#039;s possession, was not pleaded, investigated, or made the basis of the reassessment before the lower authorities. In reference jurisdiction, a new factual or legal foundation requiring record support cannot be introduced for the first time. On that footing, the Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the reassessment was upheld and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>