https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377401 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, holding the service eligible for CENVAT credit as it was not classified as industrial construction service but as mechanical work. The Department's demand for credit within a larger limitation period was rejected due to lack of grounds for alleging suppression of facts. The Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable in law and limitation, setting it aside in favor of the appellant. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:11:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377401 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, holding the service eligible for CENVAT credit as it was not classified as industrial construction service but as mechanical work. The Department's demand for credit within a larger limitation period was rejected due to lack of grounds for alleging suppression of facts. The Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable in law and limitation, setting it aside in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377401