<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1418 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377397</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of GST &amp;amp; Central Excise (Appeals), Nagpur, and confirming the admissibility of cenvat credit on insurance, group mediclaim policy services, and dismantling services. The judgment emphasized the importance of statutory requirements and the necessity for factual analysis in determining the admissibility of credits in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1418 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377397</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of GST &amp;amp; Central Excise (Appeals), Nagpur, and confirming the admissibility of cenvat credit on insurance, group mediclaim policy services, and dismantling services. The judgment emphasized the importance of statutory requirements and the necessity for factual analysis in determining the admissibility of credits in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>