<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1416 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377395</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the demand related to alleged discrepancies in filing returns and duty payment, and penalties for non-filing of returns. The tribunal directed a remand for reevaluation of the short-payment of service tax for GTA Service and the demand under Rent-a-Cab Service to verify if the tax was already paid. Penalties for non-filing of returns before the appellant took over the unit were deemed unjustifiable and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:25:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1416 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377395</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the demand related to alleged discrepancies in filing returns and duty payment, and penalties for non-filing of returns. The tribunal directed a remand for reevaluation of the short-payment of service tax for GTA Service and the demand under Rent-a-Cab Service to verify if the tax was already paid. Penalties for non-filing of returns before the appellant took over the unit were deemed unjustifiable and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>