https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377393 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is ordinarily not used to disturb a reasoned discretionary interim order of a tribunal unless it shows error, illegality, irregularity, or impropriety. Here, the tribunal had granted stay on prima facie merits and imposed a deposit condition. The High Court declined to interfere with the order on merits, but as a limited equitable measure it reduced the deposit condition from 30% to 20% of the amount due, making clear that the modification would not operate as a precedent. en-us Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:23:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377393 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is ordinarily not used to disturb a reasoned discretionary interim order of a tribunal unless it shows error, illegality, irregularity, or impropriety. Here, the tribunal had granted stay on prima facie merits and imposed a deposit condition. The High Court declined to interfere with the order on merits, but as a limited equitable measure it reduced the deposit condition from 30% to 20% of the amount due, making clear that the modification would not operate as a precedent. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377393