<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1861 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279639</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT&#039;s decision to set aside the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 1,62,49,000. The court relied on the precedent set in Cheminvest Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-VI, emphasizing that in the absence of exempt income, disallowance under Section 14A was not permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 05:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1861 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279639</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT&#039;s decision to set aside the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 1,62,49,000. The court relied on the precedent set in Cheminvest Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-VI, emphasizing that in the absence of exempt income, disallowance under Section 14A was not permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>