<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the automatic levy of interest on delayed duty payment, set aside the interest demand dropped in the impugned order, and partially allowed the appeal in favor of the Revenue based on the issues of delay in payment of duty and the interpretation of provisions of law regarding duty liability on waste products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 05:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the automatic levy of interest on delayed duty payment, set aside the interest demand dropped in the impugned order, and partially allowed the appeal in favor of the Revenue based on the issues of delay in payment of duty and the interpretation of provisions of law regarding duty liability on waste products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>