<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1629 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279640</link>
    <description>The Court declined to entertain the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for multiple years due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to respond to notices and delayed filing. Instead, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to file a statutory appeal, with a condition to pay 50% of the tax liability for each assessment year within two weeks. Failure to comply would result in the restoration of the impugned orders. No costs were awarded, and related petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 05:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1629 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279640</link>
      <description>The Court declined to entertain the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for multiple years due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to respond to notices and delayed filing. Instead, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to file a statutory appeal, with a condition to pay 50% of the tax liability for each assessment year within two weeks. Failure to comply would result in the restoration of the impugned orders. No costs were awarded, and related petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>