https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279630 Delay in executing a detention order was held satisfactorily explained where authorities acted promptly, repeatedly tried to trace the detenu, used the look out cell, published information on the police website, and issued notice under Section 7(1)(b) of the COFEPOSA Act. The delay was not attributed to lack of diligence by the authorities, and the explanation for the time taken to execute the order was accepted. The challenge to quash the detention order on this ground therefore failed. en-us Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:43:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279630 Delay in executing a detention order was held satisfactorily explained where authorities acted promptly, repeatedly tried to trace the detenu, used the look out cell, published information on the police website, and issued notice under Section 7(1)(b) of the COFEPOSA Act. The delay was not attributed to lack of diligence by the authorities, and the explanation for the time taken to execute the order was accepted. The challenge to quash the detention order on this ground therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279630