<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 60 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17451</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee should be assessed on the net interest received from fixed deposits after deducting the interest paid on loans taken against those deposits. The court emphasized the principle of mutual dealings and the importance of considering the substance of transactions for tax purposes. The decision favored the assessee and went against the Revenue&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:10:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 60 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17451</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee should be assessed on the net interest received from fixed deposits after deducting the interest paid on loans taken against those deposits. The court emphasized the principle of mutual dealings and the importance of considering the substance of transactions for tax purposes. The decision favored the assessee and went against the Revenue&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>