<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1404 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377383</link>
    <description>The court directed to accept the petitioner&#039;s revised return for the assessment year 2010-11, acknowledging the claim for depreciation. The court emphasized the importance of the claim and ordered that the revised return be processed, granting the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. Any demand based on the return was not to be enforced until the revised order was issued. The court disposed of the writ petition with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1404 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377383</link>
      <description>The court directed to accept the petitioner&#039;s revised return for the assessment year 2010-11, acknowledging the claim for depreciation. The court emphasized the importance of the claim and ordered that the revised return be processed, granting the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. Any demand based on the return was not to be enforced until the revised order was issued. The court disposed of the writ petition with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>