<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1402 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377381</link>
    <description>The court quashed the reassessment proceedings as they were solely based on a statement recorded under Section 133A without tangible material evidence, ruling the reasons for reopening assessments insufficient. The impugned notices and orders were set aside, and the writ petitions were allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1402 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377381</link>
      <description>The court quashed the reassessment proceedings as they were solely based on a statement recorded under Section 133A without tangible material evidence, ruling the reasons for reopening assessments insufficient. The impugned notices and orders were set aside, and the writ petitions were allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>