<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1401 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377380</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude M/s Schrader Duncan Ltd. and M/s Areva T &amp;amp; D as comparables for Arms Length Price determination due to significant functional and turnover differences compared to the assessee. The Court found no legal issues and dismissed the Income Tax Appeal without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1401 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377380</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude M/s Schrader Duncan Ltd. and M/s Areva T &amp;amp; D as comparables for Arms Length Price determination due to significant functional and turnover differences compared to the assessee. The Court found no legal issues and dismissed the Income Tax Appeal without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>