<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1400 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and upheld the addition of Rs. 5 lakhs under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the lack of credible evidence supporting the loan&#039;s genuineness and the lender&#039;s financial capacity. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the insufficiency of proof provided by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 26/03/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:08:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1400 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and upheld the addition of Rs. 5 lakhs under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the lack of credible evidence supporting the loan&#039;s genuineness and the lender&#039;s financial capacity. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the insufficiency of proof provided by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 26/03/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>