<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1396 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377375</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for interest on belatedly paid service tax without penalty imposition, citing the appellants&#039; failure to prove that administrative charges were reimbursable expenses. Emphasizing the requirement under section 75 of the Finance Act to pay interest for delayed tax credit, the tribunal found the appellants&#039; non-payment of interest alongside service tax indicated an intention to evade payment. The show cause notice invoking the extended period was deemed justified due to the suppression of facts. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld, with a miscellaneous application for a change of cause title being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:06:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1396 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377375</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for interest on belatedly paid service tax without penalty imposition, citing the appellants&#039; failure to prove that administrative charges were reimbursable expenses. Emphasizing the requirement under section 75 of the Finance Act to pay interest for delayed tax credit, the tribunal found the appellants&#039; non-payment of interest alongside service tax indicated an intention to evade payment. The show cause notice invoking the extended period was deemed justified due to the suppression of facts. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld, with a miscellaneous application for a change of cause title being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>