https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377372 The Tribunal found that the appellants' activity of providing Storage and Warehousing Services and selling products did not constitute Auctioneering Services. The Tribunal emphasized the differences between auction and tender processes, noting the lack of evidence supporting the department's classification. Relying on a previous decision, the Tribunal overturned the lower authorities' rulings, concluding that the appellants did not provide auction-related services. As a result, the demand for service tax was dismissed, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:06:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377372 The Tribunal found that the appellants' activity of providing Storage and Warehousing Services and selling products did not constitute Auctioneering Services. The Tribunal emphasized the differences between auction and tender processes, noting the lack of evidence supporting the department's classification. Relying on a previous decision, the Tribunal overturned the lower authorities' rulings, concluding that the appellants did not provide auction-related services. As a result, the demand for service tax was dismissed, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377372