https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377371 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the services provided were not classified as Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services but rather as job works paid on a piece-rate basis. The invoices specified charges for specific job works, not for man-hours or salaries, indicating a different nature of payment. Therefore, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside, allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs. en-us Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:06:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377371 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the services provided were not classified as Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services but rather as job works paid on a piece-rate basis. The invoices specified charges for specific job works, not for man-hours or salaries, indicating a different nature of payment. Therefore, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside, allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377371