<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1391 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not liable to pay service tax on the charges/amount collected for bill discounting facility. The Tribunal found that the services provided by the appellants fell under the exemption for money lending services as per Notification No.29/2004-ST. Citing a precedent involving UCO Bank, Kolkata, the Tribunal determined that the value equivalent to interest or discount in connection with bill discounting facility was exempted from service tax under Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the demand for service tax and penalties were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1391 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not liable to pay service tax on the charges/amount collected for bill discounting facility. The Tribunal found that the services provided by the appellants fell under the exemption for money lending services as per Notification No.29/2004-ST. Citing a precedent involving UCO Bank, Kolkata, the Tribunal determined that the value equivalent to interest or discount in connection with bill discounting facility was exempted from service tax under Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the demand for service tax and penalties were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>