<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Isolating Fee Payments for Transfer Pricing; Consistency Required in Benchmarking Method.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45460</link>
    <description>Disallowance of payments made for royalty and technical know-how received - Accepted Most appropriate method for benchmarking the manufacturing segment as TNNM - Different method (CUP method) for royalty and technical knowhow - it was not open to the TPO to subject only one element, i.e. payment of technical assistance fee, to an entirely different method (CUP)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:54:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:54:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Isolating Fee Payments for Transfer Pricing; Consistency Required in Benchmarking Method.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45460</link>
      <description>Disallowance of payments made for royalty and technical know-how received - Accepted Most appropriate method for benchmarking the manufacturing segment as TNNM - Different method (CUP method) for royalty and technical knowhow - it was not open to the TPO to subject only one element, i.e. payment of technical assistance fee, to an entirely different method (CUP)</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:54:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>