<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1352 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377331</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, holding that the penalty notices issued under Section 271(1)(c) were invalid due to the lack of specificity regarding the charge. The penalties imposed for both assessment years were deleted, and the appeals were allowed on this ground alone, rendering other arguments academic in nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1352 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377331</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, holding that the penalty notices issued under Section 271(1)(c) were invalid due to the lack of specificity regarding the charge. The penalties imposed for both assessment years were deleted, and the appeals were allowed on this ground alone, rendering other arguments academic in nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>