<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1347 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377326</link>
    <description>An addition based solely on a managing partner&#039;s statement estimating about 15% gross profit was held unsustainable where the estimate was not backed by corroborative evidence and the audited books of account had not been rejected. The legal position applied is that an admission is relevant but not conclusive, and a retracted or unsubstantiated statement cannot, by itself, support an income addition without independent and cogent material. Low gross profit, without defects in the accounts or proof that the books are unreliable, was treated as insufficient for an estimated addition. The deletion of the addition was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1347 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377326</link>
      <description>An addition based solely on a managing partner&#039;s statement estimating about 15% gross profit was held unsustainable where the estimate was not backed by corroborative evidence and the audited books of account had not been rejected. The legal position applied is that an admission is relevant but not conclusive, and a retracted or unsubstantiated statement cannot, by itself, support an income addition without independent and cogent material. Low gross profit, without defects in the accounts or proof that the books are unreliable, was treated as insufficient for an estimated addition. The deletion of the addition was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>