https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377322 The Foreign Trade Policy treated the Bill of Lading as the relevant date for reckoning import, so the Bill of Entry date was not decisive. On the facts stated, the dhall consignments were not covered by the import embargo, while peas consignments covered by Bills of Lading during 01.10.2018 to 31.12.2018 were liable to be released subject to conditions because the restrictive notification was under stay when shipped. Detained goods were also entitled to protection from demurrage under the cargo regulations, so demurrage had to be waived. en-us Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377322 The Foreign Trade Policy treated the Bill of Lading as the relevant date for reckoning import, so the Bill of Entry date was not decisive. On the facts stated, the dhall consignments were not covered by the import embargo, while peas consignments covered by Bills of Lading during 01.10.2018 to 31.12.2018 were liable to be released subject to conditions because the restrictive notification was under stay when shipped. Detained goods were also entitled to protection from demurrage under the cargo regulations, so demurrage had to be waived. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377322