<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1338 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL,  SINGLE BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377317</link>
    <description>The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, with its overriding clause and CIRP framework, prevails over inconsistent State recovery proceedings. Proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1997 could therefore be taken over by the Resolution Professional, who is entitled to control the corporate debtor&#039;s records and books of account during insolvency. An ad-interim attachment order passed after commencement of CIRP and during the moratorium conflicts with the statutory bar on coercive action against the corporate debtor&#039;s assets and cannot be sustained. The attachment is invalid and unenforceable against the insolvency process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1338 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL,  SINGLE BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377317</link>
      <description>The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, with its overriding clause and CIRP framework, prevails over inconsistent State recovery proceedings. Proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1997 could therefore be taken over by the Resolution Professional, who is entitled to control the corporate debtor&#039;s records and books of account during insolvency. An ad-interim attachment order passed after commencement of CIRP and during the moratorium conflicts with the statutory bar on coercive action against the corporate debtor&#039;s assets and cannot be sustained. The attachment is invalid and unenforceable against the insolvency process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>