<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1333 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377312</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the imposition of a penalty for delayed payment of service tax and the adjustment of excess service tax. The appellant, a Public Sector undertaking providing &#039;Telecom Services,&#039; rectified a short payment of service tax for 2008-2009 but faced penalties for delayed payment. The Tribunal found the penalty unjustified as the department was aware of the short payment. Additionally, despite procedural lapses in filing returns, the Tribunal allowed the adjustment of excess service tax paid by the appellant for 2009-2010. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s appeal was successful on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:53:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1333 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377312</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the imposition of a penalty for delayed payment of service tax and the adjustment of excess service tax. The appellant, a Public Sector undertaking providing &#039;Telecom Services,&#039; rectified a short payment of service tax for 2008-2009 but faced penalties for delayed payment. The Tribunal found the penalty unjustified as the department was aware of the short payment. Additionally, despite procedural lapses in filing returns, the Tribunal allowed the adjustment of excess service tax paid by the appellant for 2009-2010. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s appeal was successful on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>