<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1332 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377311</link>
    <description>Printing of photographs and conversion of soft-form images into hard-bound photobooks was treated as manufacture, because the process of printing, laminating, stapling and binding brought about a complete change in the identity and nature of the goods. The activity was classified under Chapter 4911 as printed pictures and photographs of the printing industry, rather than as a photography service provided by a studio or agency. The cited exemption for printing activity also supported the non-taxable treatment. Accordingly, the activity was held not liable to service tax as photography service, and the service tax demand was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:53:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1332 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377311</link>
      <description>Printing of photographs and conversion of soft-form images into hard-bound photobooks was treated as manufacture, because the process of printing, laminating, stapling and binding brought about a complete change in the identity and nature of the goods. The activity was classified under Chapter 4911 as printed pictures and photographs of the printing industry, rather than as a photography service provided by a studio or agency. The cited exemption for printing activity also supported the non-taxable treatment. Accordingly, the activity was held not liable to service tax as photography service, and the service tax demand was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>