<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1328 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377307</link>
    <description>Applications for early hearing were allowed because the amount involved was substantial, the substantive issue was already covered by earlier Tribunal decisions, and the Revenue raised no objection. The Tribunal accordingly directed the appeals to be listed for hearing on the specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1328 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377307</link>
      <description>Applications for early hearing were allowed because the amount involved was substantial, the substantive issue was already covered by earlier Tribunal decisions, and the Revenue raised no objection. The Tribunal accordingly directed the appeals to be listed for hearing on the specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>