<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1323 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377302</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s refund claim for unutilized credit under Notification No. 27/2012-CE (NT) was initially rejected for not debiting the claimed amount from the Cenvat credit account. The appellate authority upheld this decision based on strict interpretation of the exemption notification. However, the Member (Judicial) overturned this decision, stating that debiting the amount at the time of claim filing, not earlier, sufficed. The appeal was allowed, granting the appellant the refund with consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1323 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377302</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s refund claim for unutilized credit under Notification No. 27/2012-CE (NT) was initially rejected for not debiting the claimed amount from the Cenvat credit account. The appellate authority upheld this decision based on strict interpretation of the exemption notification. However, the Member (Judicial) overturned this decision, stating that debiting the amount at the time of claim filing, not earlier, sufficed. The appeal was allowed, granting the appellant the refund with consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>