<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1320 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377299</link>
    <description>The High Court criticized the Revenue Authorities for hastily revoking the stay granted to the assessee without proper justification. The Court found that the Authorities misinterpreted the Supreme Court judgment and failed to consider the delay in appeal disposal not caused by the assessee. Consequently, the Court stayed the impugned orders to halt further recoveries by the respondents and scheduled a hearing for further proceedings, providing interim relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1320 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377299</link>
      <description>The High Court criticized the Revenue Authorities for hastily revoking the stay granted to the assessee without proper justification. The Court found that the Authorities misinterpreted the Supreme Court judgment and failed to consider the delay in appeal disposal not caused by the assessee. Consequently, the Court stayed the impugned orders to halt further recoveries by the respondents and scheduled a hearing for further proceedings, providing interim relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>