<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1441 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279608</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that payments to the sub-contractor were rightly subjected to tax deduction under section 194C, not 194J. Consequently, there was no short deduction of tax, and the appellant was not liable for interest under section 201(1A). The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the appellant&#039;s compliance with tax deduction requirements under section 194C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:41:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1441 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279608</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that payments to the sub-contractor were rightly subjected to tax deduction under section 194C, not 194J. Consequently, there was no short deduction of tax, and the appellant was not liable for interest under section 201(1A). The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the appellant&#039;s compliance with tax deduction requirements under section 194C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>