<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1301 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377280</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed both the quantum and penalty appeals of the assessee. The ITAT found that the AO failed to properly assess the case regarding the addition in total income, remitting the issue back for re-investigation. As the determination of taxable income was set aside, the ITAT held that the imposition of penalty would depend on the AO&#039;s post-assessment decision. No penalty was deemed sustainable at that point.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1301 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377280</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed both the quantum and penalty appeals of the assessee. The ITAT found that the AO failed to properly assess the case regarding the addition in total income, remitting the issue back for re-investigation. As the determination of taxable income was set aside, the ITAT held that the imposition of penalty would depend on the AO&#039;s post-assessment decision. No penalty was deemed sustainable at that point.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>