<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1294 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377273</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai remitted the case back to the AO for fresh consideration after finding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision unjustified due to lack of response to additional evidence. The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of thoroughly examining supporting documents before making adhoc disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 06:08:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1294 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377273</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai remitted the case back to the AO for fresh consideration after finding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision unjustified due to lack of response to additional evidence. The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of thoroughly examining supporting documents before making adhoc disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>