<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1280 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377259</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the demand for service tax due to the absence of a valid completion certificate at the time of the flat sale. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proper authorization for architects issuing completion certificates and rejected the appellant&#039;s claim based on an unauthorized certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1280 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377259</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the demand for service tax due to the absence of a valid completion certificate at the time of the flat sale. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proper authorization for architects issuing completion certificates and rejected the appellant&#039;s claim based on an unauthorized certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>