<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1509 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence to challenge declared sale consideration and rejecting the rejection of books solely based on price differences. The decision highlighted the importance of a factual basis to support additions in such cases, ruling that provisions of section 50C were not applicable as the property was held as stock-in-trade.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 06:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1509 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence to challenge declared sale consideration and rejecting the rejection of books solely based on price differences. The decision highlighted the importance of a factual basis to support additions in such cases, ruling that provisions of section 50C were not applicable as the property was held as stock-in-trade.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>