<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1483 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279590</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT upheld the demand for Service Tax but dropped penalties imposed on the assessee-Appellants for the period October 2007 to March 2009. The Tribunal, citing previous decisions in the assessee-Appellants&#039; own case, confirmed the Service Tax liability while exercising leniency by waiving the penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. Both appeals were partly allowed, affirming the Service Tax demand and overturning the penalties, thereby concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 06:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1483 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279590</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT upheld the demand for Service Tax but dropped penalties imposed on the assessee-Appellants for the period October 2007 to March 2009. The Tribunal, citing previous decisions in the assessee-Appellants&#039; own case, confirmed the Service Tax liability while exercising leniency by waiving the penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. Both appeals were partly allowed, affirming the Service Tax demand and overturning the penalties, thereby concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>