<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1541 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279597</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed an appeal for non-compliance with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite opportunities and communications, the appellant failed to deposit 7.5% of the duty, citing financial constraints. The Tribunal noted the appellant&#039;s lack of interest in pursuing the appeal over about 4 1/2 months, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal. This case emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and active participation in legal proceedings, highlighting that financial constraints do not excuse non-compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 06:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1541 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279597</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed an appeal for non-compliance with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite opportunities and communications, the appellant failed to deposit 7.5% of the duty, citing financial constraints. The Tribunal noted the appellant&#039;s lack of interest in pursuing the appeal over about 4 1/2 months, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal. This case emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and active participation in legal proceedings, highlighting that financial constraints do not excuse non-compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>