<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 98 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17424</link>
    <description>Amounts collected under an interim court order and required to be kept in reserve did not constitute income, because the assessee had no unfettered right to appropriate the difference between the contractual storage charges and the reduced rate. Relying on an earlier decision on materially similar facts, the Court held that the amount had not accrued or arisen during the relevant assessment year. The deletion of that amount from total income was therefore upheld, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:12:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 98 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17424</link>
      <description>Amounts collected under an interim court order and required to be kept in reserve did not constitute income, because the assessee had no unfettered right to appropriate the difference between the contractual storage charges and the reduced rate. Relying on an earlier decision on materially similar facts, the Court held that the amount had not accrued or arisen during the relevant assessment year. The deletion of that amount from total income was therefore upheld, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>